Legal Opinion

MacKe v. Scaccia

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 1931No. 6 Div. 765PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The bill, filed by the purchaser ^f lands subject to an outstanding mortgage and standing in the position of the mortgagor, to enjoin a threatened foreclosure under power of sale, and to redeem the lands from the mortgage.

The present appeal is from a decree denying a temporary injunction after hearing on bill, answer, and supporting affidavits.

A mortgagor may ’proceed in equity to enforce his equity of redemption. No tender or offer to pay before suit brought need be averred or proven. No controversy or occasion for an accounting as to the amount of the mortgage debt need be shown. Submission…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carroll v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Ezzell v. First Nat. Bank of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Fair v. CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Wittmeier v. TidwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Brown v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lee v. MacOn County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Chicago, Mobile Development Co. v. G. C. Coggin Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Rolling R Const., Inc. v. DoddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Lytle v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Garrett v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API