Lehman v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Appellants appeal an order of the district court granting appellees’ motion to dismiss appellants’ first and second claims and remanding the third and final claim to the state court. On appeal, appellants raise four arguments: (1) the district court erred in failing to abstain and to remand all federal issues to the state court; (2) the district court erred in concluding that appellants’ allegations did not identify a property interest under Colorado law protected by the United States Constitution; (3) the district court erred by reaching its findings based on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Smith v. City of EnidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Barrett v. TallonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Industrial Constructors Corp. v. United States Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Morris v. State of Kan. Dept. of RevenueDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.