Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Nuss

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1977No. Docket 26767, 26768PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Maher, J.

The posture of this appeal can be understood from the accurate recitation of the facts found in Judge Beasley’s dissenting opinion.

Defendant is able to invoke the bar against *349prosecution for the Brown murder found in § 8 of the repealed criminal sexual psychopath statute. MCLA 780.501 et seq.; MSA 28.967(1) et seq., repealed by 1968 PA 143. Section 8, in effect when defendant was committed as a criminal sexual psychopathic person after being charged with the Brown murder, stated:

"No person who is found in such original hearing to be a criminal sexual psychopathic person and such finding…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. People v. ReaganMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. HernandezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. In re CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. NussMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. CutlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. NussMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API