In re Canfield
Michigan Supreme Court
Habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the •opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Npon the 7th day of October, 1890, the petitioner was sentenced, to be confined in the State prison for a term of four years. At its session of 1893 the Legislature made a change in the law pertaining to the time to be allowed in the reduction of the term of imprisonment of convicts for good behavior. Act No. 118, Laws of 1893. The difference in time allowed will be readily understood by a comparison of the acts, in parallel ■columns:
Acf of 1877. First and second years, 2 months each, 122 days. Third and fourth years, 75 days per year, 150 days. Total, 272 days.
Act of 1893. . First and second…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stephens v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Murphy v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Ex Parte RidleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- People v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Fite v. State, ex rel. SniderTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.