Bryant v. Arkansas Public Service Commission
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Sam Bird, Judge.
This appeal is brought by the Attorney General, State of Arkansas from Order No. 15 of the Arkansas Public Service Commission (Commission). The Attorney General contends that Order No. 15 is unlawful because (1) it does not include sufficient detail and findings of fact to enable a reviewing court to determine how the Commission arrived at its decision, (2) it is not supported by substantial evidence, and (3) the terms of it are arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable. We agree that Order No. 15 does not include sufficient findings to allow this court to conduct a meaningful…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Continental Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Arkansas Electric Energy Consumers v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Bryant v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
- AT&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Bryant v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Alltel Arkansas, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
- Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999