Legal Opinion

Bowytz v. Tax Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BENNETT, J.

The record in this case is very sketchy, to say the least. The case was. heard upon an agreed statement of facts in the Common'Pleas Court but the agreed statement, as it appears in the bill of exceptions, is not very illuminating.

We assume, however, that it' is admitted'' *486in argument or sufficiently shown in the record that; Fannie Bowytz was engaged in business in Toronto, Ohio, under the trade name of The Victory Market; that as a vendor of merchandise in that market, she made sales prior to November 11, 1936 of “food for human consumption off the premises” upon which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Pierce Oil Corp. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Hostetter v. HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Flanigan v. Sierra CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leganshuk v. Department of Liquor Control, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1953
  2. Weintraub v. Board of Liquor Control, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API