Legal Opinion

Weintraub v. Board of Liquor Control

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided August 3, 1953No. 187543Published

1Opinion of the Court

*351OPINION

By BARTLETT, J.

MOTION FOR REHEARING DENIED.

No oral argument will be permitted on application for rehearing. Hughes v. Roberts, 18 Abs 438, 439. Sole office of such application is to direct court’s attention to matters of fact or law that have not been given attention; not to merely rehash same matters. White v. Columbus, et al., 27 Abs 487. 496.

As pointed out in previous opinion, this Court is not required to weigh the evidence.

It is now suggested by counsel for appellant that even though appellant’s present operation is contrary to the statute, that instead of denying the application…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SteinhauerOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Hughes v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Bowytz v. Tax CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API