Legal Opinion

Jain v. McFarland

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1993No. 22646PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Facts

On August 1, 1985, Jerlean McFarland (Ms. McFarland) underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy and anterior vaginal repair. After the surgery, she experienced urinary incontinence and was referred to Dr. Ranjit Jain (Dr. Jain), a board-certified urologist. Ms. McFarland’s complaint was that she was “wet all the time.” Dr. Jain knew that Ms. McFarland had recently had a hysterectomy, but he did not perform a “methylene blue test” to detect a possible vesicovaginal fistula, 1 a hole between the bladder and vaginal wall which causes leakage of urine to the vagina. Instead, Dr. Jain…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Petersen v. BruenNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Lord v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. Greene v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Barrett v. BairdNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Grosjean v. Imperial Palace, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Wray v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Staccato v. Valley HospitalNevada Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API