Hoffman-Bruner Granite Co. v. Stark
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court.— Hons. Wm. G. TiiomP’ son and B. H. Miller, Judges. Action to recover the purchase price of a monument. Defense, a general denial. Verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.. Defendant also appeals from a ruling upon a motion to correct the record in the court below. Plaintiff will be called “ appellant.” Reversed on defendant’s appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
We do not find it necessary to consider the case attempted to be presented by plaintiff on its appeal, for reasons which will hereinafter appear. After verdict for defendant, plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial, and upon the judge’s calendar or memorandum book is found the following entry: “ Dec. 14, 1904. Motion for new trial overruled. Plaintiff excepts. „ Judgment on the verdict for costs against plaintiff. Clerk assess.” Of record under date of December 14, 1904, appears a judgment entry in accord with this direction. Plaintiff served notice of appeal December 19, 1904. Thereafter,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Stutsman v. SharplessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Case v. PlatoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Kennedy v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Callanan v. VotrubaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Moore v. McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
- Carr v. CraigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Moreno v. VietorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Puckett v. GuntherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Arnd v. PostonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.