Legal Opinion

CureVac SE v. BioNTech SE

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 14, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00222Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division CUREVAC SE (f/k/a CUREVAC AG) and CUREVAC MANUFACTURING GMBH, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 2:23-cev-222 BIONTECH SE, BIONTECH MANUFACTURING GMBH, and PFIZER, INC., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the court on one motion by Plaintiffs CureVac SE and CureVac Manufacturing GMBH (“CureVac”) and three motions by Defendants BioNTech SE, BioNTech Manufacturing GMBH, and Pfizer, Inc. (“BioNTech”),! all involving expert witness testimony regarding the TFF Patent family. In its Motion to Exclude…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API