Legal Opinion

Smith v. School City of Hobart

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 25, 1993No. Civ. H85-798PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LOZANO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the Plaintiff, Pamela Smith (“Smith”), on July 28, 1986, and by the Defendant, School City of Hobart, Indiana (the “School”) on September 29, 1986. For the reasons set forth below, the School’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and Smith’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. BACKGROUND

The parties have stipulated to the facts. On March 25, 1985, Smith was a senior class student at Hobart Senior High School in Hobart, Indiana. On this date, Smith, with two other girls, left their…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Miller v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harwood v. Johns Hopkins UniversityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Foo v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
  3. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API