Allen v. Philadelphia Electric Co. (In Re Allen)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
This adversarial proceeding, arising in a factual setting containing several unique aspects, presents, at its core, a rather straightforward issue of the inter-relationship between two (2) Code sections, 11 U.S.C. § 348, pertaining to the effect of the conversion of a case from one chapter to another, and 11 U.S.C. § 366, pertaining to the rights and obligations of Debtors seeking to retain utility service after filing bankruptcy. We hold that the phrase “after the date of the order for relief” in 11 U.S.C. § 366(b), pertinent to when adequate…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marion Steel Co. v. Ohio Edison Co. (In Re Marion Steel Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
- Maya v. Philadelphia Gas Works (In Re Maya)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Morris v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mays v. United States, Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Mays)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- In Re Penn Jersey Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Jones v. Boston Gas Co. (In Re Jones)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2007
- Whittaker v. Philadelphia Electric Co. (In Re Whittaker)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Vision Metals, Inc. v. SMS Demag, Inc. (In Re Vision Metals, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.