Legal Opinion
Mays v. United States, Department of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Mays)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 5, 1988No. 14-15610PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
The matters before the court, while taking the familiar form of an adversarial case brought by a Debtor-mortgagor to attack a Proof of Claim of a mortgagee, here the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (hereinafter referred to as “HUD”), on the basis of 11 U.S.C. §§ 506(a), (d) and a counter-motion in the main case by the mortgagee seeking relief from the automatic stay on the basis of 11 U.S.C. § 362(d), bristles with provocative issues. We shall allow the Debtor, although presently maintaining this…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Matter of Baldwin-United Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- Estate Of Roger LellockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Tanner v. FinanceAmerica Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Tanner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- In Re JablonskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bruce Energy Centre Ltd. v. Orfa Corp. of America (In Re Orfa Corp. of Philadelphia)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Taras v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. of America (In Re Taras)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Gaglia v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Wolk v. Goldome Realty Credit Corp. (In Re 222 Liberty Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re AikensUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.