Legal Opinion

Steinlage v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1979No. 40335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Appeal from judgment denying movant’s motion to amend Rule 27.26 motion filed after entry of adverse judgment on the Rule 27.26 motion.

Movant makes no objection to the Rule 27.26 adverse judgment rendered on December 27, 1977. On January 13, 1978, he filed a motion to amend his original Rule 27.26 motion. The motion to amend proposed an additional ground: that movant’s lawyer told him to lie to the court when questioned at the guilty plea hearing and that if he did not “movant would receive a lot of time.” The trial court denied his motion to amend.

His proposed amendment was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Blade v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Wade v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Thompson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Pinkard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Pines v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API