Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Lane

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1994No. 18831PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Presiding Judge.

On April 30, 1992, plaintiffs H. Eugene Boyd and Patricia Boyd filed this action against defendant Frank Lane in the Circuit Court of Pulaski County. During the course of the proceeding, plaintiffs filed an amended petition. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the amended petition failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The trial court sustained the motion “with prejudice to plaintiffs’ right to proceed further in this action.” Plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs contend that the amended petition stated a claim upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. Boatmen's National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  2. Ragan v. SchrefflerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. Rice v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Counts v. Morrison-Knudsen, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Service Construction Company v. NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mays-Maune & Associates., Inc. v. Werner Bros., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Moran v. HubbarttMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Matt v. Burrell, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Howard v. TurnbullMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Mary M. Harms v. Gregory R. HarmsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API