Legal Opinion
In re Sugarman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 17, 1978PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This is a motion for an order reinstating movant as an attorney and counselor at law of the State of New York.
The question now presented is whether this court has power *167to reinstate an attorney whose name was stricken from the rolls by reason of conviction of a felony. We think the court does not have such power.
Movant was admitted to the Bar of this State on June 29, 1942. He was convicted on June 28, 1971 of bribe receiving and taking unlawful fees, felonies under section 200.10 of the Penal Law and section 1826 of the former Penal Law. He was sentenced to imprisonment…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re GlucksmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re SugarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re SugarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- In re SugarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
4Cited by8 opinions
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of KerrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re ManvilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Brogan v. Mary Immaculate Hospital Division of Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. HoneckmanNew York Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.