Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Embalmers' Supply Co. v. Giannitti

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 7, 2007No. AC 25829Published

1ConcurrenceBishop, J.

While I agree with the majority’s disposition of these appeals, I write separately to emphasize the legal and policy reasons that an appellate court should not accord review to an unpreserved claim that the trial court exhibited partiality toward a party at trial. The defendant law firm, Modugno, Modugno & Modugno, LLC (law firm), contends that the “court erred during trial when it advised [the attorney for the plaintiff, the Embalmers’ Supply Company] on how to proceed during trial.” The “advice” the court purportedly gave was its suggestion that the plaintiffs counsel “sit down, take a deep…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Schnabel v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Notopoulos v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API