Embalmers' Supply Co. v. Giannitti
Connecticut Appellate Court
1ConcurrenceBishop, J.
While I agree with the majority’s disposition of these appeals, I write separately to emphasize the legal and policy reasons that an appellate court should not accord review to an unpreserved claim that the trial court exhibited partiality toward a party at trial. The defendant law firm, Modugno, Modugno & Modugno, LLC (law firm), contends that the “court erred during trial when it advised [the attorney for the plaintiff, the Embalmers’ Supply Company] on how to proceed during trial.” The “advice” the court purportedly gave was its suggestion that the plaintiffs counsel “sit down, take a deep…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Schnabel v. TylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Notopoulos v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.