Hardenbergh v. Hardenbergh
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Sixth District. Suit for divorce, a vinculo. For facts generally, see opinion. Plaintiff had a decree of divorce from bed and board, with leave to the parties, at any time hereafter, to file a joint petition to modify or discharge the decree, neither party being permitted to marry any other person during the lifetime of the other party.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Sixth District. Suit for divorce, a vinculo. For facts generally, see opinion. Plaintiff had a decree of divorce from bed and board, with leave to the parties, at any time hereafter, to file a joint petition to modify or discharge the decree, neither party being permitted to marry any other person during the lifetime of the other party. The Court below found, among other things, that the plaintiff had never, in good faith, asked his wife to accompany him to California j finding, at the same time, that defendant refused to come. Plaintiff appeals, and the briefs of counsel…
1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.
delivered the ojiinion of the Court—Baldwin, J. and Field, C. J. concurring.
This is a suit for a divorce on the ground of desertion. The parties were married in 1836, in the State of New Jersey, where they subsequently resided until 1849, when the plaintiff came to California. It appears that he returned to New Jersey in 1852, for the purpose, ostensibly, of removing his family, consisting of the defendant and three children, to this State; but he avers that the consent of the defendant to such removal could not be obtained, and that he was consequently defeated in the accomplishment of this…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Roby v. RobyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Strouse v. LeipfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Pace v. PaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Franklin v. FranklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Perkerson v. PerkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.