United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge:
The question here is whether on expiration of the underlying gas sales contract with the seller still committed under the Natural Gas Act, the pipeline purchaser may be compelled to take deliveries at unilaterally increased prices until such time as the FPC approves abandonments. The FPC gave an affirmative answer. We agree and enforce.
Although decision is far from easy, the facts out of which the problem emerges are simple, neither complex nor conflicting.
In January 1953 Producer 1 and Pipeline 2 contracted for the sale and purchase of gas from Producer’s Johnson…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- J. M. Huber Corporation v. William Harvey Denman and Jay Pumphrey, Trustees of the Estate of S. B. Burnett, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Weymouth v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mitchell Energy Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Matter of Tilco, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.