Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 30, 1984No. 83-1839PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The other members of a state attorney’s office are not disqualified from prosecuting *584a criminal case merely because one prosecuting attorney in the office is the alleged victim and a State’s witness in the case. See Clausell v. State, 455 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). See also State ex rel. Oldham v. Aulls, 408 So.2d 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Thompson v. State, 246 So.2d 760 (Fla.1971); United States v. Caggiano, Baszner, and Winfield, 660 F.2d 184 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, Winfield v. United States, 454 U.S. 1149, 102 S.Ct. 1015, 71 L.Ed.2d 303, cert. denied, Braszner v. United States,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Clausell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Oldham v. AullsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. United States v. Gabriel Robert Caggiano, (81-5002). United States of America v. Raymond Baszner (81-5021), Nigel Winfield (81-5022), Raymond Baszner v. United States District Court, Western District of Tennessee, Western Division, at Memphis, (81-5182)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HayesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API