Alexander v. Meyers
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
“ ‘It is well settled in this state that a new trial granted in the interest of justice is a highly discretionary order, and that, while it is not beyond the power of this court to review it, in order to reverse it must clearly appear that there was an abuse of judicial discretion.’ ” Kies v. Hopper (1945), 247 Wis. 208, 211, 19 N. W. (2d) 167, and cases there cited.
“. . . No order granting a new trial in the interest of justice shall be valid or effective, unless the reasons that prompted the court to make such order are set forth in detail therein. . . .” Sec. 270.49 (2), Stats.
The order in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Labrie v. MidwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Diffenderfer v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Kies v. HopperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Depouw v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Schmidt v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Voith v. BuserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Bolssen v. HeenanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Flippin v. TurlockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Goldenberg v. DaaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Millay v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.