Legal Opinion
Partos v. Pacific Coast S. S. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1938No. 8467PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree on a libel for damages for injury to the sailor libelant claimed to be due to the unseaworthiness of the vessel on which he was employed and, in any event, for his maintenance and cure.
Motion was made to dispriss the appeal on the ground that the record does not show a petition and allowance by the District Court of aii appeal.
The record in this case shows no formal petition for or allowance of appeal, but such petition and allowance may be inferred from the evidence’of the acts of the lower court and counsel with reference to matters…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Sage v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- The Ernest H. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Brandies v. CochraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Pacific American Fisheries v. HoofCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. Griffiths S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp. v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Edward S. Mesle v. Kea Steamship Corporation, (Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Aderhold v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Stell v. Savannah-Chatham County Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.