Galligan v. Gonzales

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

(supplemental).

In this case the judgment of the Supreme Court was affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam of that court; but the precise point of the decision, in view of an apparent misapprehension of its purport by members of the bar, should be made clear, especially as it relates to a technical point of practice in appeals from District Courts.

*328The act of 1905, page 259 (Comp. Stat., p. 1957, pl. 13b), required, in cases where the testimony had been taken down by…