Legal Opinion

Bradford v. John A. Coleman Catholic High School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Casey, J.

Defendants contend that Special Term erred in consolidating the negligence actions by different plaintiffs seeking to recover for injuries sustained in two separate football games. We agree.

“The power to order consolidation rests in the sound discretion of the court and, where common questions of law or fact exist, consolidation is warranted unless the party opposing consolidation demonstrates prejudice to a substantial right” (Cushing v Cushing, 85 AD2d 809), but “[t]he threshold requirement for consolidation is a plain identity between the issues involved in the controversies”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cushing v. CushingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Gibbons v. GroatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. In re the Arbitration between City of Cohoes & Cohoes Police Benevolent & Protective Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Locilento v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Korren v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Dunkin' Donuts Inc. v. Reyes Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Tarshish v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Viahealth of Wayne v. VanPattenNew York Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API