Legal Opinion

Tietjen v. Merchants' National Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1903PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Motion to set aside judgment. Before Judge Norwood. City-court of Savannah. August 5, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtCandler, J.

The Merchants’ National Bank brought suit in the city court of Savannah against several defendants, one of whom was Tietjen, the plaintiff in error in the present case. Tietjen filed no answer within the time required by law, and judgment was rendered against him by default. Subsequently he filed what the court below in its order called a “ motion to reopen the judgment.” This paper contained his answer to the original petition brought against him, set up that the reason he had not answered within the time required by law was that he had never been served with any summons and did not know of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Regopoulas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Brooks v. RooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Smith & Bondurant v. MeadorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hicks v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Rollins v. Personal Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Johnston v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Fields v. ArnallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Deariso v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API