Legal Opinion

Smith & Bondurant v. Meador

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 2, 1885PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Officers. Notaries Public. ■ Assignments. Before Judge Hammond. Fulton Superior Court. September Term, 1884. Smith

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Chief Justice.

The legal question which this record makes is, whether a deed of -assignment is void because the affidavit thereto was made before a commercial notary public a few days after the expiration of his term of office, and before the renewal of his appointment; and that question turns on this, was he then a de facto officer, and if not, then, under our statute, is he de jure an officer ? And that turns upon this, is the commercial notary a public officer ?

1. Public officers hold over until successors are appointed. Code, §132. Notaries public for commercial purposes are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  2. Hamilton v. PitcherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Joseph v. CawthornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Doyal v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Ridout v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Penn & Watson v. McGheeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Garcia v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API