Arnold v. Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. H. H. Cook, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.
This is a suit upon a policy of fire insurance. The Chancellor and -the Court of Chancery Appeals concurred in adjudging the policy noncollectible upon the ground of double insurance. The complainant has again appealed.
*530Tlie policy' contained this clause, to wit: “This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon, shall be void if the insured now has, or shall hereafter make or • procure, any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on property covered in whole or in part by this policy.” The case was decided on demurrer. The bill alleged that complainant was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sanders v. . CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Sugg v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Couch v. City Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
3Cited by8 opinions
- Webber v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Gough v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Norwich Union Fire Ins. Society v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Aaberg v. Minneapolis Commercial Men's Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Cole v. Atlanta Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.