Legal Opinion

Dooley v. McGillicudy

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1976No. 48168PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski

We granted leave to plaintiff, James A. Dooley, to file an original action for writ of mandamus. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 381.) After oral argument of this cause on January 19, 1976, we “ordered that a writ of mandamus issue to the County Officers Electoral Board of Cook County commanding the members of that board [defendants herein] to expunge their order sustaining objections to the nominating papers of James A. Dooley for the office of judge of the Supreme Court; to enter an order denying said objections; and to transmit to the State Board of Elections a certified copy of its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kusper v. PontikesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. AllphinIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People Ex Rel. Meyer v. KernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People Ex Rel. Rice v. CunninghamIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Sperling v. County Officers Electoral BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Board of Election Commissioners of the City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Rock v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hossfeld v. Illinois State Bd. of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Canter v. Cook County Officers Electoral BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Troutman v. KeysAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API