E. T. Gray & Sons v. Satuloff Bros.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The contract, evidenced by a series of telegrams between the parties was a contract in writing, to be construed by the court.
The existence of certain telegrams relating to the transaction being in dispute, a question for the jury was presented, in so far as such telegrams may affect the rights of the parties.
The affirmative charge being given for defendants, the plaintiffs’ version of the existence and receipt of such disputed messages must be taken as true,'in passing upon such ruling. The plaintiffs’ theory is that the instruction to the carman to load out Monday was a waiver of the delay,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elliott v. HowisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Robinson & Ledyard v. Pogue & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Mylin v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Wellden v. WittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Dickey v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gholson v. SavinOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- South Carolina Cotton Growers' Co-Op. Ass'n v. WeilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Little v. ReddittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Ellis v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.