Legal Opinion
Boulis v. State Board of Chiropractic
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 14, 1999Published
1Opinion of the Court
729 A.2d 645 (1999)
Markell D. BOULIS, D.C., Petitioner,
v.
STATE BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC, Respondent.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued November 17, 1998.
Decided April 14, 1999.
Arthur Bloom, Pittsburgh, for petitioner.
Deborah B. Eskin, Harrisburg, for respondent.
Before SMITH, J., FRIEDMAN, J., and RODGERS, Senior Judge.
RODGERS, Senior Judge.[1]
Markell D. Boulis, D.C., petitions for review of an order of the State Board of Chiropractic (Board) suspending Boulis's license to practice chiropractic.[2] We affirm.
Boulis was granted a license to practice chiropractic in Pennsylvania on November…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Slawek v. BD. OF MED. ED. & LICENSURESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Weinberg v. Commonwealth, State Board of Examiners of Public AccountantsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.