Legal Opinion

Sumner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1974No. 47022PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for fondling. After the jury returned a verdict of guilty, punishment was assessed by the court at twenty-five (25) years.

In his sole contention, appellant urges that the trial court erred in allowing ten-year-old Tanya Sumner to testify.

Appellant urges that the trial court did not question the minor about her understanding of the oath nor was the witness asked questions that dealt with her intellect and familiarity with the transaction in question prior to her being examined before the jury.

Article 38.06, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Munger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Hennington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Hines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martini v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1982
  2. Jacoy Nixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API