Legal Opinion

Nissho Iwai American Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 30, 1997No. Consolidated Court No. 90-11-00584PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Decision and Judgment on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment

Watson, Senior Judge:

This test case involves a tariff term in which footwear is described as having a “foxing-like band.” As a result of the Government’s decision that the fifteen models of athletic footwear at issue had “foxing-like bands,” the importer could not enter them under subheadings 6402.91.40 and 6402.00.15 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Under those subheadings the footwear would have been dutiable at 6%.

Instead, as a consequence of being found to have “foxing-like bands,” the footwear,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pagoda Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. Central Soya Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  3. Central Soya Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Far Eastern Department Store U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Genesco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API