Legal Opinion

Heg v. Alldredge

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 25, 2004No. 51443-1-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Kennedy, J.

— In this quiet title action, Ralph and Claudia Alldredge appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Deborah Heg by which the trial court ruled that a recorded but unopened easement for ingress, egress, access, and road purposes is appurtenant to Keg’s real property. The Alldredges contend that genuine issues of *300material fact preclude summary judgment as to whether the easement was abandoned and, if a trier of fact should find that it has not been abandoned, as to whether Ms. Heg ought nevertheless to be equitably estopped from enforcing the easement. They also contend…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Arnold v. MelaniWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Thompson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heg v. AlldredgeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Heg v. AlldredgeWashington Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API