Sirajuddin Abdul Qadir v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Crone, Judge.
Case Summary
[1] Sirajuddin Abdul Qadir appeals his conviction for attempted murder, a level 1 felony, following a bench trial. Qadir asserts that the trial court committed fundamental error in admitting evidence seized after what he claims was an unconstitutional traffic stop. Because Qadir has failed to establish any error, let alone fundamental error, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History 1
[2] The facts most favorable to Qadir's conviction are that Howard County and federal law enforcement authorities were investigating drug activity involving Reggie Balentine in early 2018.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Mathews v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.