School Dist. No. 89 of Caddo County v. Van Arsdale
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Caddo County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by W. O. Van Arsdale agains.t School District No. S9 of Caddo County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
On January 15, 1913, in the district court of Caddo county, W. O. Van Arsdale, defendant in error, sued school district No. 89 in that county in damages for the conversion of a schoolhouse. After issue joined there was trial to the court and judgment for plaintiff for $638, and defendant brings the case here.
The judgment is sustained by neither the law nor the evidence. There is no dispute as to the facts. They are: That defendant school district was organized August 6, 1901. On January 8, 1903, one Lutes contracted with the district to construct for and sell to it a schoolhouse for $950, to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Superior Mfg. Co. v. School Dist. No. 63Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of County Comr's v. Western Bank & Office Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Edwards v. School District No. 222Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Van Arsdale-Osborne Brok. Co. v. School Dist. No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920