Legal Opinion

Van Arsdale-Osborne Brok. Co. v. School Dist. No. 16

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1920No. 9637Published

Error from County Court, Comanche County; R. J. Ray, Judge. Action by the Van Arsdale-Osborne Brok- ■ erage Company against School District No. 16 of Comanche County. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

On November 6, 1902, school district No. 16 of Comanche county, Okla., issued to the Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Company a warrant in the sum of $126.50, which was subsequently for a valuable consideration assigned to the plaintiff in this ease. This action was to recover the principal of said warrant, together with interest from the date of its issue. The defense interposed by the school district to the action was that the warrant was issued in violation of section 4 of an act of Congress of , July 30, 1886, ch. 818, 24 Stat. at L. 171 (Comp. stat. 1918, sec. 3483), which is as follows:

“No…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Superior Mfg. Co. v. School Dist. No. 63Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Ray v. School Dist. No. 9, Caddo CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. School Dist. No. 89 of Caddo County v. Van ArsdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API