Legal Opinion

Rath v. Degener

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1933No. 21565. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

Appellant, Henry L. Degener, was made defendant in a bill in equity for specific performance filed by appellees, Fred Rath and Lillian Rath, his wife, in the circuit court of Cook county. Issue was joined and the cause referred to a master in chancery, who recommended that the bill be dismissed for want of equity. Objections to the master’s report were overruled and allowed to stand as exceptions. No evidence was offered or received by the chancellor and no order was entered either sustaining or overruling the exceptions. A decree was entered adopting the findings of fact but rejecting the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tryce v. DittusIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Weir v. WeirIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Barker v. HaubergIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Cassel v. CasselIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Watson v. HobsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Cottages, Miami Beach v. WegmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Fierke v. Elgin City Banking Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Ledford v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  5. Smith, Waters, Kuehn, Burnett & Hughes, Ltd. v. BurnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API