Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1925No. 8642Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant with . much vigor renews his attack upon the indictment asserting its invalidity for failure to allege the “previous chaste character” of the injured female.

An exhaustive review of the authorities from many states discloses some lack of harmony upon the point, at the same time revealing that in most instances the conflict is apparent rather than real.

Where by statute the offense of seduction is described as one against a female of ‘ ‘ previous - chaste character” it is generally held that such element is descriptive…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Ande v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  3. State v. DeWittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. State v. TimmensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API