Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Wood & Brundage

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 20, 1824PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

22 U.S. 603 (1824)

9 Wheat. 603

Ex parte WOOD & BRUNDAGE.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 11, 1824.

March 17, 1824.

This cause was argued by Mr. Haines,[a] in support of the rule, and by Mr. Emmett,[b] against it.

2Opinion of the Court · StoryJustice Story

The District Judge of the southern district of New-York, under the 10th section of the patent act, of the 21st of February, 1793, chapter 11., granted a rule upon Charles Wood and Gilbert Brundage, at the instance and complaint of Jethro Wood, to show cause why process should not issue against them, to repeal a patent granted to them for a certain invention, in due form of law; and…

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Lawrence B. LockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Branham v. Mayor & Common CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. United States v. Glaxo Group LimitedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
  4. McM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. Jared v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1821

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API