Legal Opinion

Jared v. Hill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1821PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHEN the judgment of a Circuit Court is reversed, and the proceedings up to a certain point are set aside at the costs of, the defendant in error, and- the cause is remanded for further proceedings; if the Circuit Court refuse to render a judgment for the costs according to the mandate, this .Court will grant a. *156rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue (1). (Holman J. was absent.)

The issuing of this rule to show cause, was under the appellate powers of the Court, it having no original jurisdiction in the case. Cons. 5 a. 2 s. The rule is that a Court of Appeals, as such, may award a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. United States v. PetersSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Himely v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  4. Skillern's Executors v. May's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  5. Browder v. McArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1822

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chadwick v. ChadwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hale v. Milwaukee Dock Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Tuschman v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. Witzler v. CollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
  5. Little Rock & Fort Smith Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API