Owen v. Healy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Sean Healy appeals from a default judgment entered against him in the District Court (Portland, Eggert, J.) for $7684.78, plus interest and costs. This sum represents the damage done to Charlotte Owen’s car from a collision involving her and Healy’s motor vehicles. Healy argues that the court erred when it (1) declared a default due to Healy’s personal absence at trial, and (2) denied his motion for judgment as a matter of law. While the trial court properly denied Healy’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, we agree that the trial court improperly declared a default. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sheepscot Land Corp. v. GregorySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Twin Island Development Corp. v. WinchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Guardianship of HughesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Vondell v. PurdySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Precision Air, Inc. v. Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Leonard Jack v. P and A Farms, LTD., D/B/A Crooked Creek Shooting PreserveSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012