Legal Opinion

Owen v. Healy

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 12, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Sean Healy appeals from a default judgment entered against him in the District Court (Portland, Eggert, J.) for $7684.78, plus interest and costs. This sum represents the damage done to Charlotte Owen’s car from a collision involving her and Healy’s motor vehicles. Healy argues that the court erred when it (1) declared a default due to Healy’s personal absence at trial, and (2) denied his motion for judgment as a matter of law. While the trial court properly denied Healy’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, we agree that the trial court improperly declared a default. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheepscot Land Corp. v. GregorySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Twin Island Development Corp. v. WinchesterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Guardianship of HughesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. Vondell v. PurdySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Precision Air, Inc. v. Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. Leonard Jack v. P and A Farms, LTD., D/B/A Crooked Creek Shooting PreserveSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API