Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Medina v. Hart

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided November 15, 2007No. 13-04-436-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice BENAVIDES.

This appeal arises from a medical malpractice lawsuit that was tried to a jury verdict. Appellee, Michael Hart, brought suit against appellant, Marelyn Medina, M.D., for injuries he sustained during surgery to remove a kidney stone. The jury found Dr. Medina negligent and awarded damages. On appeal, Dr. Medina argues that the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony from a witness who was not qualified under former article 4590i of the Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act of Texas. 1 Dr. Medina claims that without this testimony, there was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. v. ArmstrongTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Mendoza v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Murphy v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Fredricks, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007
  2. Good v. Baker, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  3. CENTOCOR, INC. v. Hamilton, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  4. Centocor, Inc. v. Patricia Hamilton, Thomas Hamilton, and Dr. Michael Bullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  5. Centocor, Inc. v. Patricia Hamilton, Thomas Hamilton, and Dr. Michael Bullen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API