Legal Opinion

Northeast Savings v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 18, 2006No. 92-550CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DAMAGES

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This Winstar-related case comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Upon Damages. Plaintiff seeks three elements of damages: 1) lost profits; 2) cost of raising additional capital; and 3) out-of-pocket expenses related to the breach. Defendant argues each of these damages theories fails as a matter of law. Because material facts are in dispute and the conflicting expert opinions cannot be resolved on this record, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.

Background 1

In…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API