Legal Opinion

David Sarruf v. Lilly Long Term Disability Plan and Lilly Life Insurance Plan

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 13, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00461Unknown

1Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 DAVID SARRUF, CASE NO. C24-0461-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 LILLY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN 13 and LILLY LIFE INSURANCE PLAN, 14 Defendants. 15 16 On July 3, 2025, the Court partly granted Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and 17 remanded his Employee Retirement Income Security Act benefit claim to the plan administrator 18 for reevaluation. (Dkt. Nos. 60, 61.) In so doing, the Court awarded Plaintiff reasonable attorney 19 fees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API