Legal Opinion

Jones v. Tri-State Electric Cooperative

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1956No. 19406, 19407PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

The trial judge properly construed the “expansion” provision of the contract between the Tennessee Electric Power Company and the Tennessee Valley Authority, entered into on May 12, 1939, (and under which the defendants claim as successors in title), as limited to such “expansion” of the defendants’ telephone lines as might be effectuated on existing electric poles of the Authority. The contention of the defendants that the “expansion” provision extended to poles not in existence, and to rights of way not owned or acquired by the Authority at the time of the contract, can not be…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Tinsley v. RiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Harris v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. City of Barnesville v. StaffordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Doris v. StorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adler's Package Shop, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Davis v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Columbia Nitrogen Corp. v. Dean's Power Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Stuckey v. StormsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Hyde v. GillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API