Legal Opinion

Brandenburg v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 9, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Estill Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

John Brandenburg was employed by the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company as a laborer in the original construction of one of the tracks leading from its main tracks to a new round house it was building at Irvine, Kentucky. The company provided a hand car for the conveyance of appellant and some nine or ten others of its employes, engaged with him, between their homes at Irvine and the place where they were at work about two miles distant.

On the morning of June 20, 1914, appellant and the others working with him, and four other persons not so…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville Gas Co. v. Kaufman, Straus & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  2. Caldwell's Administrator v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MinkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Woodburn v. Union Light, Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gray v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. C., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. McCaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Gray v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API