Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mink

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 10, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Whitley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*395Opinion op the Coitbt by

Judge Clabke

— Beversing.

On August 16, 1914, appellee as brakeman on one of appellant’s freight- trains was standing on top of a box car as the train was passing through the City of Mid-' dlesboro on its way from Norton, Virginia, to Corbin, Kentucky, and was injured. The telephone company in Middlesboro, in order to carry its telephone wires across appellant’s railroad track, maintains a cable some two or three inches in diameter across the track and from twenty-two to twenty-five feet above the track, in which place and position it was held by posts on either side of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. FulghamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  3. Caldwell's Administrator v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Paducah Traction Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  5. City of Corbin v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ChattersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Kentucky Glycerine Co. v. Woodruff Development Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Frank Fehr Brewing Co. v. CorleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Stephens v. Kitchen Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Chadwick v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API