Legal Opinion

J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 23, 1960No. 63989; protests 316570-K/9044, etc. (Chicago)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The protests enumerated in the attached schedule of protests involve shipments of certain cane sticks cut from the giant reed, Arundo donax, on which duty was assessed at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 405 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, for “Wood, unmanufactured, not specially provided for.” The protest claim in each case is for free entry under the provision in paragraph 1806 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “Sticks * * * in the rough.”

When the protests were called for trial, they were, upon motion of counsel for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rico Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API