Godat v. Waldrop
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
This is an action for fraud. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment granting defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. ORCP 21B. They contend that the trial court erred in concluding that their claim is barred by res judicata or by the doctrine of election of remedies. The issues are whether plaintiffs are barred from pursuing their fraud claim, which was bifurcated from their claim for specific performance in order to obtain calendar preference and whether the trial court erred in allowing defendants’ motion for reconsideration. We reverse and remand.
Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Koch v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- McAllister v. Charter First Mortgage, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Huszar v. CERTIFIED REALTY COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Office Services Corp. of America v. CAS Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Helmer v. Transamerica Title InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Eulrich v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Kaste v. Land O'Lakes Purina Feed, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Arter v. SpathasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.