Legal Opinion

Kranz v. Hiatt

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1947No. 200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus which Carl Kranz, a prisoner in the United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, seeks to file in forma pauperis, refers to testimony of witnesses and exhibits introduced against him at his trial, and alleges in substance that the verdict of the jury should have been “Not Guilty.” He also refers to a remark allegedly made by-the trial court during such proceedings which he contends was prejudicial.

It is well settled that habeas corpus cannot be substituted for an appeal from the judgment of conviction. In this case it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Price v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  3. Potter v. DowdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  4. Eury v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kranz v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Kranz v. United States District Court of New JerseyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API